Not currently. That seems to be similar to G92 which we support so it might not be too hard.
Regards
TK
| Group: DynoMotion |
Message: 2043 |
From: himykabibble |
Date: 10/25/2011 |
| Subject: Re: G52 Support? |
Tom,
Yes, it's basically just another offset that gets added to the current work offset, without changing the current work offset. Handy for temporarily shifting offsets, then putting them back to where they were, without having to know where they were. For a simple example, I will often zero the Z axis to the top of a workpiece, face-mill it, then use G52 to shift the zero down, by the amount the face-mill took off, to put zero at the new surface. When I load the next piece, I just use G52 to clear that new offset, and start over.
Regards,
Ray L.
--- In DynoMotion@yahoogroups.com, Tom Kerekes <tk@...> wrote:
>
> Not currently. That seems to be similar to G92 which we support so it might not be too hard.
> Â
> Regards
> TK
>
> From: himykabibble <jagboy@...>
> To: DynoMotion@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 9:19 PM
> Subject: [DynoMotion] G52 Support?
>
>
> Â
> I notice KMotion CNC does not support G52. Any plans to add this?
>
> Regards,
> Ray L.
> |
|
| Group: DynoMotion |
Message: 2044 |
From: Tom Kerekes |
Date: 10/25/2011 |
| Subject: Re: G52 Support? |
Hi Ray,
I'm not a machinist and we can probably add that if necessary, but you can't you do the same thing with G92 and G92.1?
After face-milling it down enter:
G92 Z0
Then G92.1 to clear the offset.
Regards
TK
| Group: DynoMotion |
Message: 2045 |
From: himykabibble |
Date: 10/26/2011 |
| Subject: Re: G52 Support? |
Tom,
Good point! Yes, I could. I got used to not using G92 because of bugs in Mach3 that make it unreliable.
Regards,
Ray L.
--- In DynoMotion@yahoogroups.com, Tom Kerekes <tk@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Ray,
> Â
> I'm not a machinist and we can probably add that if necessary, but you can't you do the same thing with G92 and G92.1?
> Â
> After face-milling it down enter:
> Â
> G92 Z0
> Â
> Then G92.1 to clear the offset.
> Â
> Regards
> TK
>
> From: himykabibble <jagboy@...>
> To: DynoMotion@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:10 PM
> Subject: [DynoMotion] Re: G52 Support?
>
>
> Â
> Tom,
>
> Yes, it's basically just another offset that gets added to the current work offset, without changing the current work offset. Handy for temporarily shifting offsets, then putting them back to where they were, without having to know where they were. For a simple example, I will often zero the Z axis to the top of a workpiece, face-mill it, then use G52 to shift the zero down, by the amount the face-mill took off, to put zero at the new surface. When I load the next piece, I just use G52 to clear that new offset, and start over.
>
> Regards,
> Ray L.
>
> --- In DynoMotion@yahoogroups.com, Tom Kerekes <tk@> wrote:
> >
> > Not currently.ÃÂ That seems to be similar to G92 which we support so it might not be too hard.
> > ÃÂ
> > Regards
> > TK
> >
> > From: himykabibble <jagboy@>
> > To: DynoMotion@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 9:19 PM
> > Subject: [DynoMotion] G52 Support?
> >
> >
> > ÃÂ
> > I notice KMotion CNC does not support G52. Any plans to add this?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ray L.
> >
> |
|
| | | |
